— by Hannah Lee
Most Americans are protected from the travails and vagaries of our food sources. The five-year cycle of Congressional debates on agricultural subsidies may underwhelm you, but it is relevant to your family's well-being in hidden ways. On Thursday, the Senate approved a new farm bill that would cost nearly $1 trillion over the next 10 years.
More after the jump.
Sugar subsidies were left in place. Crop insurance was reduced for the wealthiest farmers, those with adjusted gross incomes of more than $750,000. This was through the efforts of Senators Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), saving $1 billion over 10 years. Recipients would now have to take steps to reduce erosion and protect wetlands, according to a last-minute amendment by Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-Georgia). The bill eliminated about $5 billion a year in direct payments to farmers and farmland owners, whether or not they grew crops.
The limited good news is new funding for the next generation of farmers through an amendment by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). The bill will also expand block grants to states for research and promotion of fruits and vegetables. It will encourage the expansion of farmers' markets. It will consolidate several conservation programs to make them more efficient.
Despite the efforts of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York), the biggest cuts were to the food stamp program, now known as the Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP.
The House will begin discussion of the bill after the July 4th recess. The House Republican budget presented by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) would reduce food stamp spending by about $134 billion over the next decade and turn the program into block grants for the states.
Among the 64 Senators approving the Farm Bill was our own Robert Casey (D), while among the 35 Senators rejecting the Farm Bill was Patrick Toomey (R). Senator Mark Kirk (R-Illinois) was the sole abstention.