B: State of the Poles - June 2012: Arctic Ice Extent Below Normal; Antarctic Ice Near Normal

The  state of global polar sea ice area in early June 2012 has once again  fallen below climatologically normal conditions (1979-2009).   Arctic sea ice loss is primarily responsible for this change in  condition since just last month.  Arctic sea ice melted quickly in May  because it was thinner than usual; Antarctic sea ice has refrozen at a  near normal rate during the late austral autumn.  Polar sea ice  recovered from an extensive deficit of -2 million sq. km. area three  months ago to a +750,000 sq. km. anomaly one to two months ago before  falling back to a -1 million sq. km. deficit.  After starting the year  at a deficit last year, sea ice area spent an unprecedented length of  time near the -2 million sq. km. deficit in the modern era in 2011.   Generally poor environmental conditions established and maintained this  condition, predominantly across the Arctic last year.  The last time  global sea ice area remained near 19 million sq. km. through May was in  2007, when the Arctic extent hit its modern day record minimum.
Arctic Ice

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), weather conditions during the latter part of the previous winter and  spring were less conducive for Arctic sea ice freezing on the Atlantic  side of the Arctic while conditions were more conducive than usual for  freezing on the Pacific side.  Sea ice melt during May was more than  normal: 1.62 million sq. km. instead of 1.38 million sq. km.  As such,  May′s extent was below average for the month in the satellite record.   Arctic sea ice extent on in May averaged 13.13 million sq. km.  Barents and Kara Sea ice remained very much below normal, more so than in recent years.   The Bering Sea, which saw ice extent growth due to anomalous northerly  winds in previous months, instead witnessed above normal conditions.   Overall, near surface temperatures were warmer than average across the  Arctic Ocean.

In terms of longer, climatological trends, Arctic sea ice extent in April has decreased by -2.3% per decade.   This rate is lowest in the spring months than the late summer months.   Note that this rate also uses 1979-2000 as the climatological normal.   There is no reason to expect this rate to change significantly (more or  less negative) any time soon.  Additional low ice seasons will  continue.  Some years will see less decline than other years (like this  past year) - but the multi-decadal trend is clear: negative.  The  specific value for any given month during any given year is, of course,  influenced by local and temporary weather conditions.  But it has become  clearer every year that humans are establishing a new normal in the  Arctic with respect to sea ice.  This new normal will continue to have  far-reaching implications on the weather in the mid-latitudes, where  most people live.

Arctic Pictures and Graphs

The following graphic is a satellite representation of Arctic ice as of April 28, 2012:

Photobucket

Figure 1 - UIUC Polar Research Group's Northern Hemispheric ice concentration from 20120428.

Compare this with June 7th's satellite representation, also centered on the North Pole:
Photobucket

Figure 2 - UIUC Polar Research Group's Northern Hemispheric ice concentration from 20120607.

The  sea ice in the Bering Sea, as mentioned above, formed more quickly and  to a further southern extent than is normally seen, but has largely  melted already due to the ice's young age and thin depth.  What remained  missing this winter and early spring was the sea ice north of  Scandinavia.  This is the result of anomalously warm waters from the  Gulf Stream being drawn further north than is normal.  This is due to  the positive AO index & NAO index during the last boreal winter and spring.  As a side note, this  phenomenon combined with the most recent, moderate La Niña in the  Pacific Ocean has led to Dec-May being anomalously warm and dry for most  of the U.S.  Indeed, this year has been the warmest Jan-May period on  record in the US, as I will detail in a separate post.

Overall, the health of the remaining ice pack is not healthy, as the following graph of Arctic ice volume from the end of May demonstrates:

Photobucket

Figure 3 - PIOMAS Arctic sea ice volume time series through May 2012.

As  the graph shows, volume hit a record minimum earlier in 2011 before  returning to the -2 standard deviation envelope.  I understand that most  readers don't have an excellent handle on statistics, but conditions  between -1 and -2 standard deviations are rare and conditions outside  the -2 standard deviation threshold (see the line below the shaded area  on the graph above) are incredibly rare: the chances of 2 of them  occurring in 2 subsequent years under normal conditions are very, very  remote indeed.  Hence my assessment that "normal" conditions in the  Arctic are shifting from what they were in the past few centuries.  Note  further that after conditions returned to near the -1 standard  deviation envelope in late 2011/early 2012, volume has once again fallen  rapidly outside of the -2 standard deviation area.  The chances that  this would happen three separate times in three consecutive years is  exceptionally remote.  That means that natural conditions are not the  likely cause; rather, another cause is much more likely to be  responsible for this behavior.

Switching back from volume to area, take a look at May's areal extent time series data:

Photobucket

Figure 4 - NSIDC Arctic sea ice extent time series through early June 2012.

This  winter allowed the extent to do something it had not done for the most  recent handful of winters: a return of ice extent to within the -2  standard deviation envelope.  Indeed, the extent in April briefly  matched average conditions before a relatively warm spell melted ice  quickly in mid-April.  The reason for this is a shift in wind  conditions: speed and direction both changed from late winter through  this last month.  Those winds piled sea ice up instead of pushing it  apart.  The disadvantage: ice extent decreased, as seen in Figure 4.   The advantage: ice volume grew, as seen in Figure 3.  The effect on this  September's minimum extent will indicate how helpful the early season  winds were in building sea ice that doesn't melt every year back up.   During May, as I wrote above, melting occurred at a slightly faster rate  than normal, resulting in a return to near-record low extent  conditions.

Occasionally, I also like to include a supplemental  time series graph that the NSIDC report contains.  Here is this month's  supplemental graph:

Photobucket

Figure 5 - NSIDC Arctic sea ice extent time series of ice extent conditions comparing previous years' data and 2012 data through May.

This  graph contains all of the same data as the previous graph and adds the  time series lines from the previous 5 winters.  As you can see, extent  varies during the same month from year to year.  The recent decline in  extent, caused by a change in wind direction and speed, has reduced  Arctic ice extent back to ~13 million sq. km., which is well below  normal for May.  The past three winters also saw similar magnitude  reductions through May, although the starting and ending values were  obviously different.  Despite these differences in subsequent years, the  minimum ice extent values were quite similar: at or near the record low  set in 2007.  Will fall 2012 be any different or will the surge in ice  growth on the Pacific side of the Arctic help to stave off the worst  effects seen in the past five years?

Antarctic Pictures and Graphs

Here is a satellite representation of Antarctic sea ice conditions from April 28th:

Figure 6 - UIUC Polar Research Group's Southern Hemispheric ice concentration from 20120607.

Compare that graphic with the same view from June 7th:

Photobucket

Figure 7 - UIUC Polar Research Group's Southern Hemispheric ice concentration from 20120607.

Ice  gain is easily visible around the continent.  As a reminder, this is  largely and somewhat confusingly due to the ozone depletion that took  place over the southern continent in the 20th century.  This depletion  has caused a colder southern polar stratosphere than it otherwise would  be, reinforcing the polar vortex over the Antarctic Circle.  That vortex  has helped keep cold, stormy weather in place over Antarctica that  might not otherwise would have occurred to the same extent and  intensity.  As the "ozone hole" continues to recover during this  century, the effects of global warming will become more clear in this  region, especially if ocean warming continues to melt sea-based Antarctic ice from below.  For now, we should perhaps consider the lack of global warming signal due to lack of ozone as relatively fortunate.

Finally, here is the Antarctic sea ice extent time series from June 7th:

Photobucket

Figure 8 - NSIDC Antarctic sea ice extent time series through early June 2012.

Antarctic  sea ice extent had remained above average to some extent through the  austral summer and early spring, which is good news.  The difference in  conditions from the first part of 2011 to the similar time period in  2012 is obvious: NSIDC measured last year's extent near the bottom of  the standard deviation envelope while this year's extent is much  healthier.  Despite the shift in preceding conditions, extent in May  2011 and 2012 returned to normal.

Errata

Here are my State of the Poles posts from May and March.

You can find NSIDC's June report here.

Cross-posted at WeatherDem - the blog.

Go to CO State Page
Category: 
origin Blog: 
origin Author: 
Showing 0 comments