The abortion debate in a nutshell, or why I'm pro-choice

Gail Collins neatly sums up something I've been saying for a while: You are either pro-life with no exceptions or you are pro-choice. There can be no middle ground:

The idea of banning abortion except for rape and incest cases makes anti-choice politicians sound more evenhanded, but it doesn’t actually make much sense. If you believe life begins at conception, then that’s a life, and you should try to convince women not to terminate any pregnancy, no matter what the cause. Our difference of opinion is over whether you can impose your beliefs with the threat of cops and penitentiaries.

And if rape victims deserve exemptions because their situation is dire, what about other women with unwanted pregnancies and terrible stories? The real crime of people like Mourdock and Akin is that their inartful language throws a sudden stark light on a stance that sounds so unthreatening when a candidate simply says: “I’m pro-life.”


Pretty simple, don't you think?

Send me an e-mail.

Read poetry at The Subterranean.

Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

Go to State Page
origin Blog: 
origin Author: 
Comments Count: 
0
Showing 0 comments